Logo

What do you think of OpenAI CEO Sam Altman stepping down from the committee responsible for reviewing the safety of models such as o1?

Last Updated: 29.06.2025 07:06

What do you think of OpenAI CEO Sam Altman stepping down from the committee responsible for reviewing the safety of models such as o1?

from

guy

“Some people just don’t care.”

Why prices from these cities in Utah and Nebraska won't be included in inflation data - NPR

(barely) one sentence,

“anthropomorphically loaded language”?

by use instances.

What was it like being spanked as a kid?

to

when I’m just looking for an overall,

increasing efficiency and productivity,

Should we consider deporting democrats to Canada?

three, overly protracted, anthropomorphism-loaded language stuffed, gushingly exuberant, descriptive sentences.

An

and

Pedro Sánchez torpedoes Nato unity on eve of crucial summit - Financial Times

will be vivisection (live dissection) of Sam,

in the 2015 explanatory flowchart -

“[chain of thought is] a series of intermediate natural language reasoning steps that lead to the final output."

Endometriosis is an interesting disease - Hacker News

In two and a half years,

“RAPID ADVANCES IN AI”

“Rapidly Evolving Advances in AI”

NASA Releases Its Clearest Mars Images Yet – 140 Million Miles Away, And Everyone’s Noticing The Same Strange Thing - Indian Defence Review

Damn.

September, 2024 (OpenAI o1 Hype Pitch)

Function Described. January, 2022

How do you like to be pegged?

“Rapid Advances In AI,”

“Rapidly Advancing AI,”

Let’s do a quick Google:

What do you like the most about black people?

ONE AI

January 2023 (Google Rewrite v6)

- further advancing the rapidly advancing … something.

What are some of your shocking stories?

“Talking About Large Language Models,”

Of course that was how the

Is it better to use the terminology,

Why did it take seven days for troops with helicopters, equipment, supplies, food, and water to be dispatched to southeast storm zones?

Same Function Described. September, 2024

Further exponential advancement,

within a day.

Why do people keep saying they have evidence and have presented it that proves you're wrong even though they have none and haven't presented anything? Furthermore, what do they think you're wrong about?

The dilemma:

(the more accurate, but rarely used variant terminology),

has “rapidly advanced,”

better-accepted choice of terminology,

step was decided,

Nails

"a simple method called chain of thought prompting -- a series of intermediate reasoning steps -- improves performance on a range of arithmetic, commonsense, and symbolic reasoning tasks.”

"[chain of thought] learns to break down tricky steps into simpler ones. It learns to try a different approach when the current one isn't working. This process dramatically improves the model's ability to reason."

“EXPONENTIAL ADVANCEMENT IN AI,”

“[chain of thought] a series of intermediate natural language reasoning steps that lead to the final output."

Combining,

or

prompted with those terms and correlations),

putting terms one way,

within a single context.

(according to a LLM chat bot query,

“RAPIDLY ADVANCING AI”

I may as well just quote … myself:

January, 2022 (Google)

with each further dissection of dissected [former] Sam.

"[chain of thought means that it] learns to break down tricky steps into simpler ones. It learns to try a different approach when the current one isn't working. This process dramatically improves the model's ability to reason."

Fifth down (on Full Hit)

the description,

“anthropomorphism loaded language”

of the same function,

DOING THE JOB OF FOUR

Eighth down (on Hit & Graze)

It’s the same f*cking thing.

describing the way terms were used in “Rapid Advances in AI,”